The Science of Urbs and Its Discontents: A Proposal for Reconceptualizing Urbanism
Keywords:
Transdisciplinarity, urban space, phenomenology, urban studies, capitalist urbanization, sociospatial transformationsAbstract
This paper suggests a mode of inquiry for urbanism based on transdisciplinarity. Our contention is that if massive geohistorical developments pose a fundamental challenge to the entire field of urban studies (its basic epistemological assumptions, categories of analysis, and object of investigation), as posited by some researchers, then a satisfactory way of meeting such challenge cannot come from within urban studies or any other discipline, but rather from a transdisciplinary perspective “beyond and between disciplines,” one that rejects scientific realism and uses its own, distinct epistemological axioms to flesh out the interactions between object and subject (knowledge and design, discovery and creation) in research as the preliminary foundation for a new conception of urbanism. This paper works as a draft where the focus is on collecting and organizing evidence as a first step in our project for a proposal for transdisciplinary urbanism.
Downloads
References
Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality, Anchor Books: Garden City, NY
Brenner, N. and Schmid, C. 2011. Planetary urbanization. In: Gandy, M. (Ed.), Urban Constellations, Jovis, Berlin.
Brenner, N. (Ed.), 2013. Implosions/Explosions. Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, Berlin: Jovis.
Brenner, N. and Schmid, C. 2014. The ‘urban age’ in question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3): 731–755.
Castells, M. 1976. Is there an urban sociology? In: Pickvance, C., (Ed.), Urban sociology: critical essays. Methuen, London.
Castells, M. (1977 [1972]. The urban question: a Marxist approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Davis, K. 1955. The origins and growth of urbanization in the world. American Journal of Sociology 60.5, 429-437.
Davis, K. 1959. The world’s metropolitan areas. International Urban Research, Institute for International Studies. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
del Cerro Santamaría, G. 2017. Iconic Urban Megaprojects in Global Context. Revisiting Bilbao, in Flyvbjerg, B. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press
del Cerro Santamaría, G. (Ed.), 2013. Urban Megaprojects. A Worldwide View, Bingley: Emerald
del Cerro Santamaría, G., Bilbao. Basque Pathways to Globalization, London: Elsevier.
Gans, H.J. 2009. Some problems of and futures for urban sociology: Toward a sociology of settlements. City and Community, 8(3): 211-219.
Gottmann, J. 1961. Megalopolis, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1961
Hall, P. and Pain, K. 2006. The polycentric metropolis. Earthscan, London.
Kruger, L. 2013. Imagining the Edgy City: Writing, Performing, and Building Johannesburg, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heisenberg, W. 1998. Philosophie-Le manuscrit de 1942, Paris, Seuil, translation from German and introduction by Catherine Chevalley.
Husserl, Edmund. 1966. Méditations cartésiennes, Vrin, Paris. Translated form the German by Gabrielle Peiffer and Emmanuel Levinas.
Lefebvre, H. 1968. Le droit à la ville. Anthropos, Paris.
Lefebvre, H. 1970. La révolution urbaine. Gallimard, Paris.
Lefebvre, H. 1989. Quand la ville se perd dans une métamorphose planétaire, Le Monde Diplomatique, May, 16-17.
Merleau Ponty, M. 2013 [1945]). Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge
Montuori, A. 2008. Gregory Bateson and the Promise of Transdisciplnarity. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 12(1-2): 32-45
Morin, Edgar. 2005. On Complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Nicolescu, Basarab. 2002. Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity, State University of New York Press, New York, USA, translation from the French by Karen-Claire Voss.
Nicolescu, Basarab. 2008. (Ed.) Transdisciplinarity–Theory and Practice, Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, USA.
Nagel, E. and James R. 1958. Newman, Gödel’s Proof, New York University Press, New York.
Nicolescu, Basarab. 2010. Methodology of Transdisciplinarity: Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering and Science, 1(1): 19-38.
Oswin, N. 2016. Planetary urbanization: A view from outside. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(3): 540-546.
Resnik, D.B. 2000. A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 31(2): 249-267.
Roy, A. 2009. The 21st century metropolis: new geographies of theory. Regional Studies 43(6): 819-830.
Roy, A. 2015. What is urban about critical urban theory. Urban Geography, 37(6): 810-823.
Ruddick, S. 2015. Situating the anthropocene: planetary urbanization and the anthropological machine. Urban Geography, 36(8): 1113-1130.
Ruddick, S., Peake, L., Tanyildiz, G.S. and Patrick, D. 2017. Planetary urbanization: An urban theory for our time?. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(3): 387-404.
Sayer, A. 1984. Defining the urban. GeoJournal, 9(3): 279-284.
Soja, E. 2010. Regional urbanization and the end of the metropolis era. In: Bridge, G. and Watson, S. (Eds.), The new Blackwell companion to the city, Blackwell, Cambridge MA.
Soja, E. and Kanai, M. 2007. The urbanization of the world. In: Burdett, R. and Sudjic, D. (Eds.), The endless city, Phaidon, London.
Taylor, P.J. 1994. The state as container: territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2): 151-162.
Walker, R. 2015. Building a better theory of the urban: A response to ‘Towards a new epistemology of the urban?’. City, 19(2-3): 183-191.
Williams, R. 1973. The Country and the City, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wirth, L. (1969 [1937]). Urbanism as a way of life. In: Sennett, R. (Ed.), Classic essays on the culture of cities, Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



